Team Discussion Question BUS 415 Renita Livingston, Jacob McMahan, Wendy Hughes ,Denisse Rojas July 7, 2012 Noel Woodward Paulette is the owner of the inclination On Mobile Home Park. For several years, Albert regularly smooth drive for Paulette from the tenants of the energetic home park. Recently, Paulette learned that Albert pocketed some occupy he collected, so Paulette shoot Albert, and revoked his authority to collect operate assumements from tenants. However, incomplete Paulette nor Albert told any tenants of Alberts termination. Yesterday, Albert went around to T presentsas mobile home and asked for the rent. Theresa nonrecreational Albert the money owed to Paulette. Albert never gave this money to Paulette. Is Theresa liable(predicate) to pay Paulette? why or why non? What profound rationale did you open? Discuss an instruments obligations toward his principal. Is this an ostensible capital punishment event? Do apparent agency principles apply? How does apparent agency differ from the other types of agency principles? When is an employer responsible for the tortious actions of an employee? What does cooking stove of employment live with to do with the employers financial obligation? Does is matter if the agent is an independent contractor rather than an employee? transport provide an slip and explain how agency principles apply to the situation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edca2/edca250ace1ab4a8d2d80c64434b012d040951ef" alt="bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!"
Theresa is non liable to pay Paulette because she paid Albert and when Paulette fired Albert Paulette did not testify any tenants that she fired him and to not pay him no more. If Paulette would rescue informed Theresa that she is not to pay Paulette then There! sa would be liable. The legal principle that applies here is apparent authority, the appearance of being the agent of another (employer or principal) with the power to act for the principal. Since under the jurisprudence of agency the employer (the principal) is liable for the acts of his employee (agent), if a person who is not an agent appears to an outsider (a customer) to have been given authority by the principal, then the...If you want to astonish a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.